Is the world choosing geoengineering by default?

by BuryCoal on December 9, 2011

in Climate change, Climate science

Judging by the Durban talks, the world as a whole really doesn’t see climate change as an urgent issue. Nor is there any willingness whatsoever to cut emissions by the amount necessary to prevent temperature rise of over 2°C.

Does this make geoengineering inevitable? 

If the atmospheric concentration of CO2 keeps rising sharply until 2020 and beyond, preventing radical climate change through future emissions cuts may well be impossible. At that point, the deliberate manipulation of the climate system may be the only option that remains.

Report a typo or inaccuracy

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

. December 9, 2011 at 4:58 pm

Sweden, the U.K., and Germany: The European trio leads the world in fighting climate change.

That’s the finding of the most recent Climate Change Performance Index [PDF], which was released yesterday at COP 17 in Durban. But Swedes, Brits, and Germans shouldn’t cheer just yet; even their countries are not contributing their fair share.

In fact, that is the most worrying result of the index: No country is doing enough to seriously fight climate change. Consequently, the report — published by Germanwatch and Climate Action Network Europe — did not reward any country a ranking of 1-3. The countries ranked worst this year are Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Kazakhstan.

. August 24, 2012 at 3:19 pm

Geoengineering
Implicit promises
A geoengineering experiment has come unstuck. But there will be more

May 19th 2012 | Mainz | from the print edition

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: